Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$global_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 468

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$blog_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 469

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_hits is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 475

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_misses is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 476
Iowans dismiss three judges – AOI – The American Orthodox Institute – USA

Iowans dismiss three judges

This is the story Harry Coin mentioned in a comment a few days ago. The story is huge, not only for the political implications — the removal of activist judges, but that gay marriage, a moral question with the deepest cultural implications, was the driver leading to their removal.

America values the public square, which is why the great debates about morality develop a political cast, even though they can never be reduced to politics alone. When morality and politics coalesce into a seamless unit however (Progressive politics for example), America runs the risk of becoming captive to ideology (and following the failures of the Europeans — fascism, Nazism, Communism, Jacobism, and other deceptions).

The American Founders however, in their great wisdom, realized that the greatest threat to liberty is centralized power which is why the restrictions of the Bill of Rights concern the government, not individuals. Iowans, to their great credit, showed us again why the Founders were right, and why America, despite our faults, is still the home of the free.

Source: DesMoinesRegister.com

Iowans dismiss three judges

Three Iowa Supreme Court justices lost their seats Tuesday in a historic upset fueled by their 2009 decision that allowed same-sex couples to marry.

Vote totals from 96 percent of Iowa’s 1,774 precincts showed Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justices David Baker and Michael Streit with less than the simple majority needed to stay on the bench.

Their removal marked the first time an Iowa Supreme Court justice has not been retained since 1962, when the merit selection and retention system for judges was adopted.

The decision is expected to echo to courts throughout the country, as conservative activists had hoped. “It appears we’re headed for a resounding victory tonight and a historic moment in the state of Iowa,” said Bob Vander Plaats, the Sioux City businessman who led a campaign to remove the justices because of the 2009 gay marriage ruling. “The people of Iowa stood up in record numbers and sent a message … that it is ‘We the people,’ not ‘We the courts.’ ”

In a statement issued early today, the three justices said: “We hope Iowans will continue to support Iowa’s merit selection system for appointing judges. This system helps ensure that judges base their decisions on the law and the Constitution and nothing else. Ultimately, however, the preservation of our state’s fair and impartial courts will require more than the integrity and fortitude of individual judges, it will require the steadfast support of the people.”

Read the entire article on the DesMoinesRegister.com website.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

7 responses to “Iowans dismiss three judges”

  1. Eliot Ryan

    We are obliged to obey and defend the laws given by God to us. Certain godless men have secretly slipped in among us. They figured out the way to break the laws of God. They secured judiciary position and are trying to drive out the grace of God from the nation and world. They provide license for sin and immorality, while some “churches” bestow their “blessings” on them. I’m glad they are now finally openly exposed.

  2. This has interesting implications for the next election cycle. IIRC the CA same sex marriage case is now before the Supreme Court. If SCOTUS upholds morality, so much the better. If not, well, the issue of constitutional ammendment should be raised, given its proven voter popularity at the state level.

  3. George Michalopulos

    Isa, it’s even better than that. The Secular Left has now been reduced to the judiciary. Their deathgrip on it will only get stronger. However, what the judiciary gives, it can take away. I personally would love to see the Congress restrict the appellate jurisdiction of the courts (it can do that) but in the meantime, how about finding sympathetic judges and overturning bad precedents? It can happen. I actually believe that it will.

    In the meantime, there’s nothing wrong with liberal judges feeling fear every now and then. If they looked over their shoulders a little more often, they’d think about the implications of their actions and possibly save themselves some electoral grief.

    Accountability, accountability, accountability.

    1. Chris

      The secular left being reduced to judges seems to be a worldwide trend. Perhaps this is what they wanted?

  4. Rush just said that CNN reported that self identified homosexuals voted for Republicans 4% more this election cycle, to 30 something %.

    Because of the common law basis of the legal system, the judicial doesn’t take away as well as it gives.

    I’d like the Republicans with their new majority in the IA house to get the Democratic Senate on record for a constitutional amendment to undo this decision. That can take away quite well.

  5. Harry Coin

    Readers note: the following summary of Fr. Hans intro above fits into the limits of a ‘facebook status’ — feel free to post as your status if so inclined:

    Hans Jacobse: “When morality and politics coalesce into a seamless unit (i.e. Progressive politics), America risks becoming captive to ideology (note the failures of the Europeans — fascism, Nazism, Communism, Jacobism…). The American Founders, in their wisdom, realized that the threat to liberty is centralized power. That’s why the restrictions of the Bill of Rights concern the government, not individuals.”

  6. Harry Coin

    Item: Iowa uses a Supreme Court election method where a group of 12 people propose 3 names to the governor who picks 1, then they stand for re-election their first year. While nobody was paying any attention in yesterday’s news it was revealed that 11 of the 12 were democrats, with 1 unknown.

    Those judges who created law and got booted for it were quoted as saying they hope the foregoing process would be retained ‘to avoid politicizing court appointments’. Sure.

Leave a Reply to Eliot Ryan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5481