Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$global_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 468

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$blog_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 469

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_hits is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 475

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_misses is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 476
China: Expo, the Orthodox celebrate St. John of Shanghai – AOI – The American Orthodox Institute – USA

China: Expo, the Orthodox celebrate St. John of Shanghai

At the Expo, the Chinese authorities allow the Orthodox community to celebrate regular prayer services. Local communist officials also present at the ceremony commemorating the saint, who reunited the Orthodox community in the early thirties.

Shanghai (AsiaNews) – The small Chinese Orthodox community have celebrated St. John of Shanghai with a “moleben,” a solemn liturgy. The ceremony was chaired by Archpriest Alexei Kiselevich, rector of the Orthodox community of the metropolis, in the church of St. Nicholas.

Many foreign faithful in town to visit the Expo also took part in the moleben, as well as local government representatives. In fact the authorities allowed the Orthodox to hold regular prayer services during the universal exhibition. During the year, however, the Orthodox Church is normally under strict control: regular celebrations take place only within the Russian embassy. The Orthodox Church is not among the five religions recognized by the government.

The Russian Orthodox Church arrived in China about 300 years ago. The first communities were made up of Russian emigrants and resided mainly in the north. Even now the majority of believers are of Russian descent. They are located in four parts of the country: in Heilongjiang, Harbin, where there is a parish dedicated to the Protective Cloak of the Mother of God in Inner Mongolia (Labdarin) in Xinjiang (in Kulj and Urumqi).

The Cultural Revolution wiped out the presence of bishops and priests. Even today, the faithful have no priest, and they gather to pray only occasionally on Sundays. However, there are 13 Chinese students studying at the Orthodox Sretenskaya Theological Academy of Moscow and the Academy of St. Petersburg. For large celebrations at Christmas and Easter there are Russian priests who celebrate the liturgies, but within the territory of the embassy or consulates.

The Chinese Orthodox Church has a separate jurisdiction, but the Patriarchate of Moscow and Constantinople are trying to entice it into their orbit. Metropolitan Nektarios, based in Hong Kong depends on the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. Here many publications for the faithful in China are printed and he has often stressed the need for greater religious freedom.

In fact St. John of Shanghai was a champion of religious freedom. Born in Ukraine in 1896, he arrived in China in 1934 after being consecrated bishop. Here he met the Orthodox community, divided on ethnic grounds, and completed the construction of the great cathedral. After the takeover by the Maoists, he was forced to immigrate to San Francisco, where he died.


Posted

in

by

Comments

11 responses to “China: Expo, the Orthodox celebrate St. John of Shanghai”

  1. George Michalopulos

    Up until now, I haven’t given much thought as to the EP/MP rivalry in regards to China. Given the history of Chinese Orthodoxy and its martyriology, it appears that the Russian claim is far stronger. Plus, the fact that there is no Greek migration to China would seem to me to upend the plans of the Phanar’s claims (to say nothing of its first metropolitan there, whose pastorate was scandal-plagued).

    1. Steve

      George, I’m confused. If most services are conducted in the Russian Embassy, as the article stated, how can there be a greek metropolitan? Does this bishop have any flock there? And if not (as I suspect) then how can the EP possibly make a claim to China

      Steve

      1. The EP’s jurisdiction was created when Hong Kong was still a Crown Colony. It has no direct link to the original Chinese Church.

    2. There’s no contest: the marriage (literally) of the Chinese and Cossacks produced the Orthodox Albazinians in 1685.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albazinians

      St. Innocent of Irkutsk was consecrated bishop for China, but was denied entry, so he settled in Irkutsk instead and established the episcopate there. His successor consecrated Ioasaph as the first bishop of America, and St. Innocent Enlightener of Alaska was his namesake. In some ways, the American mission grew out of the mission to China. The favor was repaid as many former bishops in America (e.g. Innocent, Paul) went back to Russia and furthered the mission to China from there.

      The treaty of Kyakhta (1727) secured the right of the Russian Church to maintain its jurisdiction in Peking. St. Innocent’s namesake, Innocent of Peking and All China established the episcopacy in 1902.

  2. East Asian Orthodox

    Dear Mr. George Michalopulos

    Plus, the fact that there is no Greek migration to China would seem to me to upend the plans of the Phanar’s claims (to say nothing of its first metropolitan there, whose pastorate was scandal-plagued).

    May I know whom did you refer to as “its first metropolitan there” and what scandals? I am an East Asian, although currently under EP due to its mission here, actually I kind of agree with many of your views I read at this website. Anyway, my knowledge is very limited and personally I don’t mind being in any jurisdiction. However, I am really puzzled about your comment as quoted above, if you are referring to the one we know, it seems that you may get information that doesn’t match with our direct experience with him. It is not to say that you are mistaken etc, just that if you can kindly clarify, I would like to cross check with that. Thank you.

    1. George Michalopulos

      Sir, thank you for your kind words. I mean Metropolitan Nikita Lulias (who has recently –and most sorrowfully–applied for Turkish citizenship). The scandal I refer to has to do with the controversies that happened under his watch with the Indonesian Orthodox Church and the persecution of Fr Daniel Byantaro, the founder of that Church.

      1. East Asian Orthodox

        Thank you, Sir, for the clarification. It is sad that Patriarchate of Constantinople is still under Turkish yoke. I don’t know much to comment further about Turkish citizenship, but if God willing Metropolitan Nikitas becomes the next Patriarch, personally I will be glad. And some Orthodox here expressed hope for that, as he was very much into mission. I only talked to him directly once, and he was very friendly and left a very good impression on me. He also reminded the priests that “the Church is Orthodox, not Greek Orthodox.” I also heard many Orthodox in this region talked highly about him.

        [Editor: Since you indicated below that you don’t know if your information is accurate, I have removed it.]

        I am in no position to judge anyone, neither saying that your information is surely wrong. However from my own experience, your info about Metropolitan Nikitas is one-sided. God willing when you have time to visit Orthodox parishes in East Asia, you can gather more info from many sides and may have a more balanced view about this matter.

        Forgive me if I have any wrongs here or any inaccurate info. Thank you.

        May Christ our God unite all Orthodox in US, East Asia and all the world. Lord have mercy!

        1. George Michalopulos

          Sir, there is no need to apologize. What information I have was given to me first and second hand. Although I am well aware that there are two sides to every story, I have no reason to doubt the veracity of what was told to me. Personally, i think the issue is ongoing and it is up to the Lord to judge, not me. I pray I gave no offense.

          My only other quibble is that we must remember that there is more than one “patriarch” in the world. If we speculate as to whethter Bishop So-and-So is elected patriarch, we must state which patriarchal see is being talked about. All bishops are equal. Again, I say this only to clarify, not engage in rhetorical pugilism.

  3. Jolynn Ruggerio

    So George I presume when you say you have recieved the information first and second hand that you have spoken personally to both Fr. Dan And Metro. Nikita personally. And the scandals you refer to you are prepared to address with credible citation.

    Fr. Johannes the last time this came up you removed the posts and wisely so. Your site will lose credibality if it is allowed to become a forum for unfounded gossip and slander. I’ve met one of the parties on several occasions and the other I have known well nearly 30 years. Thereare akways layers to these types of cirumstances and we have enough in our own “households” to be concerned with>

  4. George Michalopulos

    Jolynn, so good to hear from you again. To answer your question, “yes.” Stay tuned.

    1. Jolynn Ruggerio

      Fr. Johannes,

      The missions statement of this site is such, “The American Orthodox Institute is a research and educational organization that engages the cultural issues of the day within the Orthodox Christian moral tradition.”

      I fail to see how unfounded allegations on news that is several years old supports the mission of AOI”

Leave a Reply to Steve Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5481