Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$global_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 468

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$blog_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 469

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_hits is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 475

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_misses is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 476
ACNA’09: Metropolitan Jonah calls Anglicans to return to Apostolic Faith – AOI – The American Orthodox Institute – USA

ACNA’09: Metropolitan Jonah calls Anglicans to return to Apostolic Faith

By Michael Heidt | Special to Virtueonline | www.virtueonline.org | 6/24/2009

Ed. Note: Finally, a hierach not afraid of speaking moral truth.

Highlights:
“Homosexualism not only “destroys authentic masculinity, it destroys authentic womanhood.”
“Gay ideology is neither from nurture or nature… we cannot accept their lifestyle or validate their unions.”
“We must eliminate any shred of immorality in our lives,” not least because sin “kills and maims the soul… and “demoralizes our culture.”
“A culture demoralized by immorality “cannot stand up to the strict asceticism of Islam.”
“Faith… is the knowledge of the heart (that) I have died and my life is hidden in the heart of God… it is only Jesus that matters.”

Metropolitan Jonah
Metropolitan Jonah
Speaking on Wednesday morning to the ACNA Assembly, His Beatitude, Jonah, Metropolitan of All America and Canada and leader of the Orthodox Church in America (OCA), called for a “full… intercommunion” with the Anglican Church in North America. “What will it take,” he asked, “for a true ecumenical reconciliation? That is what I am seeking by being with you today.”

This marks the potential resumption of an Orthodox/Anglican dialogue that began a hundred years ago between two missionary bishops, St. Tikhon of Moscow and Bishop Grafton of Fond du Lac, only to be broken off in the 1970s with the ordination of women. Metropolitan Jonah spoke as the successor of Tikhon, “I come to you as the successor of Tikhon… with the same openness, the same invitation, the same love and desire to unify Anglicanism and Orthodoxy.”

What would it take for this reconciliation to occur? The Metropolitan was explicit:.

Full affirmation of the orthodox Faith of the Apostles and Church Fathers, the seven Ecumenical Councils, the Nicene Creed in its original form (without the filioque clause inserted at the Council of Toledo, 589 A.D.), all seven Sacraments and a rejection of ‘the heresies of the Reformation.”

His Beatitude listed these in a series of ‘isms’; Calvinism, anti-sacramentalism, iconoclasm and Gnosticism. The ordination of women to the Presbyterate and their consecration as Bishops has to end if intercommunion is to occur.

These are controversial words, especially given the make up of the Assembly, which is admittedly divided on key issues such as the ordination of women, the nature and number of the Sacraments and perhaps the essential character of the Church itself. Still, the delegates welcomed his candor with applause, perhaps because His Beatitude was self-evidently “speaking the truth with love.” Less controversially, he called for a true renunciation of sin and immorality, “We must eliminate any shred of immorality in our lives,” not least because sin “kills and maims the soul,” likewise immorality, which destroys the soul and “demoralizes our culture.” Coming from a faith tradition fully alive to the aggressive threat of militant Islam, the Metropolitan issued the following warning:; a culture demoralized by immorality “cannot stand up to the strict asceticism of Islam.”

He then spoke to the current blurring of gender identity. Homosexualism not only “destroys authentic masculinity, it destroys authentic womanhood.” Again, “gay ideology is neither from nurture or nature… we cannot accept their lifestyle or validate their unions.” These are not something healthy, but “something to be healed”. His Beatitude was equally emphatic on abortion, “Abortion not only rips out the soul of the fetus from the body of a woman, it rips out her own soul also… We must stand together in an absolute condemnation of abortion.” The Assembly rose in thunderous acclamation. There should be no doubt whatsoever that ACNA stands for the life of the unborn child.

The Metropolitan’s words on the unity of the Church were equally well received. We must find, “unity of vision, unity of life, unity of being in Jesus Christ” in the power of the Holy Spirit. This is to be found in true orthodoxy, which means, for Jonah at least, not simply “right opinion”, but also “right glory”, which is discovered in the worship of God. This gives the faithful entry into the liturgy of the Angels and Saints as revealed to Moses, Ezekiel and St. John, being a true participation on earth in the worship of heaven. The same meeting of heaven and earth is to be found in the Church; this “is not simply human, it is divine,” and to be believed in as we believe in Jesus Himself – not merely as a man made institution, who may or may not “like the same prayer Book”, but as the organic union of Christians with Our Savior in the Body of Christ. Again, this met with spontaneous applause.

The same approval was given to his Beatitude’s description of faith and the necessity of surrendering to Christ.

“Faith… is the knowledge of the heart (that) I have died and my life is hidden in the heart of God… it is only Jesus that matters.”

This means a total self-oblation:

“We have to surrender to God in the depths of our being,” and this “is that spiritual quest… to be transformed by the Spirit.” The corollary of this is radical forgiveness and a giving up of all resentments against those “who have offended… abused… (and) slandered you… When you forgive like that, you liken yourself to Jesus Christ.”

This, in the end, was at the heart of Metropolitan’s message. He called on ACNA to embrace Christ in His totality – in His Church and Sacraments, in the Faith and Morals handed down by Jesus Himself to the faithful throughout the ages, and in that true repentance which is nothing other than complete surrender of self to the mind and Person of Our Lord. With such a spirit in place, his vision of unity between loyal Anglicans and Orthodoxy may be realized. There can be no question that the invitation is on the table, and the prize is big, nothing less than the recognized integration of the Anglican Church in North America with historic Catholicism. Will ACNA rise to the challenge?


Posted

in

by

Comments

20 responses to “ACNA’09: Metropolitan Jonah calls Anglicans to return to Apostolic Faith”

  1. Mark AC

    I’m glad to hear that he spoke clearly about “Calvinism, anti-sacramentalism [and] iconoclasm” as being insuperable barriers to unity between Orthodoxy and Anglicans of any stripe. However, this most likely makes any kind of unity with this group an unachievable goal, since those three things are common attributes of the low-church Anglicanism that forms the predominant strand in the ACNA. As one Anglican blogger who saw the speech said, Met. Jonah “…gore[d] the oxen of almost every party among us.” In any case, I am glad he spoke the truth, rather than engaging in the lowest common denominator ecumenism we see so much of today (and which some of his other statements, taken in isolation, could imply).

  2. George Michalopulos

    Mark, it may be “unbridgable” but so what? It’s the truth and some will see it for the Truth. That’s all we can do. I feel that even among the low-church guys, the Holy Spirit is working. We need to pray for them.

  3. Edith M. Humphrey

    Further to the comments by Mark and George (if either of you are clergy, please forgive the lack of title):

    Low church evangelicals are drawn to the Church every day. One example is my own husband, who came to Christ in the context of the Salvation Army, was disturbed about the lack of sacraments, and so became Anglican, but with very low sacramentalism. He did not have our daughters baptized as babies, and I accepted his decision, as head of the house. He is now Orthodox (was chrismated before I was) because he discovered the importance of Holy Tradition and the Church. There are many more evangelical Anglicans who are concerned for the Truth, and they will find it, I believe. The Holy Spirit delights in surprising us, and upsetting our preconceptions. Many of the “low church” tendencies of evangelical Anglicans are born of an allergic reaction to papalism, legalistic dogmatizing and the rigid clericalism in Rome. Orthodoxy offers to them an undistorted sacramentalism, which answers to their deepest desires.

  4. Ilya Kharin

    I believe you are right, George. Very inspiring to hear the words of a true hierarch – and if it is inspiring for us, so it is for anyone, since there is a basic unity of human nature. We are strongest when we are most Orthodox – most wholesome, and, thus, holy.

    Equal-to-the-apostles Nicholas of Japan, a contemporary and peer of St. Tikhon of Russia and North America, when asked what it was that most attracted Japanese to Orthodoxy (and in his day Orthodoxy grew in Japan faster than other “denominations”) said plainly: “the dogmas”. The core teachings of the Church are what people most thirst to hear, witness and live.

  5. Joe

    “Will ACNA rise to the challenge?”

    No, but individual ACNAers may rise to the challenge and become ex-Anglicans, ex-Episcopalians and ex-ACNAians by becoming Orthodox.

  6. Fr Gregory Jensen

    I think that Mark AC, I think that what must be surrendered will be for many Anglicans means that they will not be reconciled with the Orthodox Church. Nor, for that matter, will they be reconciled with the Roman Catholic Church. But, at the risk of offending unnecessarily, many of those who listened to Metropolitan Jonah are Protestant pure and simple who have no desire to be anything else but Protestant.

    But, I also think George is correct, the Holy Spirit is nevertheless at work in the hearts of all and whatever might be the difficulties of corporate reconciliation, individual reconciliation (as Joe said) is ALWAYS possible. And I think his Beatitude did well by his willingness to lay out the difficulties rather than dance around the issues. Without bias to his brother bishops, the Metropolitan spoke, as Ilya said, as a true hiearch of the Orthodox Church and God has already brought good out of the speech.

    Finally, and most encouraging of all, his Beatitude spoke not so much of conversion as he did of reconciliation. This seems to me to represent a significant, and much needed, shift in how the Orthodox Church engages Christians in other traditions. His Beatitude has emphasized this need for reconciliation not only ecumenically but also in the internal life of the Church here in America and on the universal level. And again, this represents a significant and much needed shift in our understanding of ourselves and our relationship with each other.

    In Christ,

    +FrG

  7. George Michalopulos

    Fr Greg, repentance on our part is required as well. Perhaps your word “reconciliation” is what we are looking for. We Orthodox need to repent of our, yes, obscurantism. Let’s be honest, all this folderol regarding canon 28 is nothing but folderal as it is not about Christ. As long as we Orthodox hold up Christ as our standard, then everything else will follow. I fervently believe this.

  8. Chrys

    I must agree with George. While we must always be concerned to maintain good order, to those outside the Church, the power politics that emerges around such issues as canon 28 will only tend to convince people outside the Church (and some inside) that there is nothing particularly special about being Orthodox or Christian or both. While Christ emptied Himself, fallen humanity universally grasps; our own grasping invariably undermines our claim to follow the self-emptying Christ.
    But if we are willing to “be lifted up on the cross” — to demonstrate real poverty regarding power, humility regarding prerogatives, dedication to the Truth and a willingness to sacrifice every advantage for “the great pearl” of Christ — then Christ will, as He always does, “draw all men” unto Himself. In the end, that Church will have what the others seek to grasp: the hearts of men, the blessings of God, “and everything else besides.”

  9. George Michalopulos

    Edith, I’m just a layman. I love your insights. They call us Orthodox to repentance because we too can fall into a high-sacerdotalism that is antithetical to the Gospel. Low-church Evangelicals are right to recoil in horror from such attitudes. We Orthodox should as well.

    It is my belief that with monastic bishops (true monastics, like +Jonah) we can restore the proper relationship between bishops and priests, which will in turn encourage the laity to take up their royal priesthood office. There’s more than enough work in Christ’s Church for every member.

  10. Fr Gregory Jensen

    George,

    One of the interesting things in his Beatitude’s presentation was he comment that there is a need for a change of heart on the part of the Orthodox as well. Not in terms of dogma but rather in terms of our willingness to learn from Christians in other traditions. The example he used was women’s ministries. While he clearly articulated the fact that ordination of women to the presbyterate and episcopate is contrary to the tradition of not only the Orthodox Church but also the Roman Catholic and Oriental Orthodox Churches he also said that the Orthodox could and should learn about women’s ministries from the Anglicans.

    Without trying to speak for his Beatitude, I think in his public statements he has been clear that there is much that needs to change in the Orthodox Church. Again not dogmatically but psychologically and sociologically. While this is (at best) secondary in terms of a hierarchy of truths, we ought not to underestimate the importance of such a change and not only for our relationship outside the Church. More than one person has told me that s/he has seen how we mistreat each other and it has caused them to walk away from the Church. Some of these people have been inquirers, but other were converts, people baptized as infants and (in more cases then I care to recount) clergy. One clergyman told me directly, he had to leave because the anti-Western mindset he encountered day in and day out among Orthodox Christians was poisoning his soul and his family life.

    If we cannot, or will not, treat each other with common decency and ordinary justice, our witness fails and we deliver a still born Christ.

    In Christ,

    +FrG

  11. George Michalopulos

    All, as much as I loved +Jonah’s speech (I saw it live and would love to see it again), something stuck with me that had little to do with the call for reunion with ACNA. It had to do with his remarks re abortion, homosexuality, etc., which as an Orthodox Christian I most wholeheartedly agree with.

    Basically it’s this: his remarks about the “destructiveness” of homosexuality were not merely theological/legalistic, but anthropological/cultural. In other words, it “distorts normal masculinity” AND “normal femininity.” Why is this important from an anthropological standpoint? Because God ordered the human race into two mutually complementary sexes. Each brings its own gifts to the table. The present crisis of the West is a theological/anthropological crisis. Men have sex outside of marriage, women look to the state to help raise their children, men thus are cuckolded by the state, etc. Other women abort their children because of some felt “necessity.” Men increasingly look to other men for their satifaction which will reorder our cultures into hierarchical castes not unlike Classical Greece and Rome, which of course, fell because of rampant immorality. They stopped reproducing, thereby barbarians came in an overwhelmed them demographically (if not militarily).

    None of this is good. For one thing, it flies in the face of traditional Christian teaching and the animating egalitarian principles of the American Republic. (Male homosexuality enforces a rigid caste system in all societies that practice it.) Moreover –and +Jonah said this–it makes it next to impossible for us to stand against an “ascetical Islam.” He’s right. Back to the fall of the Roman Empire.

    So where am I going with this? Can any of you imagine anybody in the other jurisdictions preaching this same sermon? Until Nov 2008, no primate of the OCA could have as well. Why? Because it is widely believed that too many of our hierarchs in some of the ethnic jurisdictions, are themselves homosexual.

    I know SCOBA released a statement in 2003 regarding the incompatibility of homosexual “marriage” with Orthodoxy. Good for them. I agree with these words completely. But let’s be honest, we seriously dodged a bullet because of our inconsequential numbers. (At least one of those signatories was homosexual.) I am convinced that because of +Jonah’s higher profile in America, gay groups will be gunning for us, looking to “out” certain bishops in order to compromise our moral witness.

    Is it possible that in proclaiming the Gospel in its undiluted form, +Jonah was unwittingly laying down markers vis-a-vis other Orthodox bishops in America? I for one don’t believe he was playing games. I think he was openly and honestly –and completely without guile–reaching out to hurting Christians in this new Anglican province.

    Nevertheless, it is possible that in preaching the Gospel, +Jonah’s words may have a salutary effect on us as well, causing us to get our own house in order.

    1. George, this is a long time after the fact, but I wanted to comment on your post above regarding the phenomenon of homosexual clergy in the Orthodox Communion. It does no good for us to take on the perspective of the world and use the word “homosexual” as though it is fixed, self-interpreting adjective. Do we mean that a person has homo-erotic desires? That a person is engaging in homo-erotic activity? What precisely do we mean?

      If the leaders to which you are referring are celibate, then it makes no difference what their temptations are. If they are sexually active, then that is a different matter! As it would be if single priests/ bishops/ were involved in a heterosexual affair.

      I have decided myself, because of the way in which the term “homosexual” is used, and all the baggage that it carries today (predetermined by genetic makeup, influenced by culture, etc. etc.) not to use the term. I prefer to speak of “homoerotic activity” and “desires” so that those with whom I am speaking know precisely what I mean.

      Best to you all this Bright Week!
      Edith

      1. Fr. Johannes Jacobse

        Edith. A good bright week to you as well.

        I agree with the thrust of your point that the term “homosexual” ought not to be a self-interpreting adjective. And yes, while the ascetic effort towards chastity requires the same discipline for both a person with same-sex desire and opposite-sex desire, it is important I think to include that even though both struggle, same-sex desire has a different psychological starting point than heterosexual desire.

        I realize you are not making this point, but one of our problems is that we often overlook that spiritual fatherhood and motherhood requires that the person first be grounded in his masculinity or her femininity. That means the same-sex conflicts should be non-existent or resolved. A person with unresolved conflict, even if celibate, all too often does not possess the psychological maturity to lead in the manner required no matter how well-intentioned he or she may be.

        1. Geo Michalopulos

          Edith, you raise several interesting points. I think in the main you are right in that even with those who struggle with same-sex attraction disorder (SSAD for purposes of our present discussion) are not as set in their ways as the present Pink Mafia/Brownshirts would have us believe. History is littered with the names of men who engaged in homoerotic liaisons but upon finding a women, lost these feelings and settled down into heterosexual monogamy. Lord Keynes, the famous historian was one such individual. I believe Oscar Wilde likewise, these are just the famous guys. And let’s not forget that in ancient Greece, ephebophilia (the love of male adolescents) was just one option open to any freeborn man (who was always expected to be the sodomist, not the sodomite).

          So yes, I do believe that the tableaux of human sexuality runs the gamut, often within the same individual depending on the individual and the particular stage in his life. Going back to ancient Greece, the same freeborn man was expected to be the sodomite in the relationship while he was young but was to put aside this inclination when he attained his majority. (Those that maintained their effeminate posture were put out of polite society and relegated to the margins of the polis, never trusted with the profession of arms or with citizenship.)

          Perhaps we can blame Freud who psychologized on this phenomenon and categorized SSAD as a psychological malady. Though Freud has been proven wrong on so many things –I believe psychoanalysis is pseudo-scientific at best–I think he was onto something here. I think that Fr Hans perhaps said it best that their is some type of psychic disorder that leads to the attraction in the first place and that we would do well to forgo the inclusion of such men into the priesthood regardless of whether they are chaste or not. To put not too fine of a point on it, 99% of all heterosexual males simply hold effeminate men in contempt. Oh sure, we’ll plunk down $100 for a ticket to see Elton John in concert, or listen to Johnny Mathis records, but we extend a certain latitude to men in show business which is full of corruption that we wouldn’t tolerate in our schools, families, businesses, etc. In other words, the real world.

  12. Fr. Johannes Jacobse

    George, no doubt Met. Jonah’s clear focus on homosexuality was meant to provide clarity to the ACNA which, among other reasons, has split from the mainline Episcopal Church over its captivity to thinking of homosexual alliances solely in egalitarian terms, primarily as a “human right.” In drawing out the anthropological dimension, Met. Jonah is saying (correctly) that profound implications exist for any culture or institution that normalizes homosexuality, and he is urging his listeners to think through them.

    You are right. The crisis in Western culture is primarily anthropological. The commandments compel behaviors that conform to the deep structure of our being, a structure that can’t be grasped apart from the knowledge that man is more than the passions (the drives) he feels. This begins of course in the Church. If a Church has men in positions of leadership that are homosexual however (such as the Episcopalian Church), the word that needs to be taught, the insights that need to be gleaned, the prophetic leadership that our time requires in order to bring healing into the world cannot happen. It will shipwreck the Church instead, just as we have seen with the mainstream Episcopalians.

  13. Fr. Johannes Jacobse

    Note 10. Fr. Gregory, it’s just a quibble but I want to make sure readers don’t misunderstand what you clearly meant as a literary turn of phrase:

    If we cannot, or will not, treat each other with common decency and ordinary justice, our witness fails and we deliver a still born Christ.

    Christ can’t be stillborn. It’s an ontological impossibility. Instead, I think the judgment is greater here, probably closer to the condemnation Christ gave to the Pharisees, or the warning James gave to the teachers. Our lack of common decency and respect drives others away from Christ and our temples become white-washed sepulchers. Our judgment is deserved.

  14. cherokee steve

    Thank you Metropolitan Jonah! Finally we have an Metroploitan that will go out and doing something and help spread the orthodox faith here in North America. Just don’t forget us Cherokee’s here in Oklahoma.

  15. Chris Banescu

    What a breath of fresh air! This hierarch really takes his sacramental calling seriously and has the courage to speak with boldness and moral clarity.

    Has a full transcript of Metropolitan Jonah’s address been published anywhere? I would help to have more of his comments available in writing.

  16. Edith M. Humphrey

    There is no transcript yet, so far as I can see. But, I believe, there is something better–will take longer than reading, but it will also give you the “personal” view of the Metropolitan. The video is released at http://www.anglicantv.org/ –you can’t miss which one it is, as it is labeled. The only sadness that I have in no longer being Anglican is that I was not present at the ACNA launch to hear him, and had to rely on live streaming. (I would certainly have been there as an Anglican!) One thing to pray about: some are worried that the Metropolitan’s words were “divisive”, since various groups applauded various parts. Now, of course, Jesus also caused a schisma among the people when he spoke truth, so this can be used by the Holy Spirit. But please pray that this is not used as a pretext for forgetting Archbishop Jonah’s marvelous challenge and encouragement (for it was both). I can tell you, I know these people personally, and many of them want the Church and they want the whole truth. They are weary, worn and sad, and are longing for a Church that lives and speaks as it should.

  17. Edith M. Humphrey

    Oops, sorry, just noticed that the url line extends too far–cut and paste, don’t just click.

    Don’t know how that happened, sorry.
    E.

Leave a Reply to Fr Gregory Jensen Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5481