Canon 34 would require major concessions on Rome’s part.
This brings us ante 1056 where Canon 34 provides justification for the schism.
We go around in circles.
What is meant or envisioned by this elusive “unity”? Doctrinal unity? Unity of ecclesiological organization? Hierachial unity? These mean vastly different things! It is not altogether clear to me what the goal is here.
Unity is seductive.
]]>Precisely!
It may also be noted unity is not something that can be (super)imposed. Such a unity (if we could call it that) would cause more problems.
]]>