Fr, possibly, but the recent bold overseas overtures by Turkey have caused the Russians to throw some cold water over Turkish ambitions. The thing with Cyprus for instance may cause a dust-up because Russia has significant holdings in Cyprus and doesn’t like the instability of the current status.
I’m more concerned about what the role of the EP is in all this. The fact that the Phanar is beholden to Ankara, essentially is its handmaiden, does not bode well for the furtherance of the Gospel. Nor for that matter the Antiochian’s subservience to the Assad regime. Regardless of what we may think about the recent synaxis of the “ancient” patriarchates, the fact that Antioch’s patriarch couldn’t attend makes a mockery of the concept that the ancient patriarchates (Istanbul and Alexandria as well) are anything but puppets who must kow-tow to their Islamic overlords.
]]>Since the Fall of Communism, the new line of confrontation is between the “live” Orthodox churches, and the “dead” ones.
We’ve seen this repeatedly. The attitude of the live churches (Russia, Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece) seems to be, “Go ahead and have your meetings – but any decision of consequence will need to include the “live” churches as well as the ancient patriarchates.”
Facts are facts…most of the Orthodox in the world no longer live in the ancient patriarchates. For 70 years, communism allowed us to deny this reality. With the fall of communism and the re-emergence of the national churches, that is no longer the case.
Call is “Realpolitik – Orthodox style” if you like.
This is a great example of that.
Best Regards,
Dean Calvert
Patriarch Kirill feels this view is justified, because there are over 200 million Russian Orthodox Christians. That’s more Russian Orthodox Christians than all of the other Orthodox Christians combined from all of the other countries of the world.
]]>