Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$global_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 468

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$blog_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 469

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_hits is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 475

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_misses is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 476

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php:468) in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Pat. Kirill on Chambesy https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/ A Research and Educational Organization that engages the cultural issues of the day within the Orthodox Christian Tradition Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:29:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.3 By: Isa Almisry https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8578 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:29:52 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8578 In reply to Dean Calvert.

Yes, it has been my contention all along that Moscow is giving Constantinople just enough canon 28 rope to hang itself. Hence the understatement which gets its message across clear enough.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8570 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:42:05 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8570 Ditto, Dean. I think you hit the nail squarely on the head. God bless +Kirill.

]]>
By: Dean Calvert https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8566 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:56:37 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8566 George,

I thought that entire paragraph, mentioned above by Isa was absolutely “loaded” if you ask me. Here’s the paragraph, along with my interpretation:

“For the sake of church peace we agreed to have the bishops’ assemblies chaired in accordance with diptychs. [However ridiculous is might seem, we are allowing C’nople to chair these regional meetings] However, the powers of the chairmen and the bishops’ assemblies themselves were defined very clearly.[i.e. there is a limit to our patience – ‘chairing’ means just that, we all know where this is going – so let’s get started] As we insisted [interesting choice of words], all their decisions will be made only by consensus. [the chairing of assemblies is a temporary thing – the assemblies will be organizing themselves in short order] Canonical relations of bishops with their own Primates and Synods are not challenged, nor are the powers exercised by bishops in the diaspora diminished. [this one is interesting – a statement that ‘bishops are bishops’- implying to me the power which will ultimately reside in the assembly of bishops, not in a SCOBA type executive committee]. Thus, our bishops in the diaspora will be able to make an active influence on the decision-making process in bishops’ assemblies [in other words, we will be monitoring events closely – read: C’nople – this is your last chance].”

Please forgive my cynicism – but, as you know, I grew up in the GOA.

Best Regards

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8563 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:14:08 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8563 Dean, Ben, it seems that the money quote in +Kirill’s statement is: “Canonical relations of the bishops with their own Primate and Synods not challenged…”

To my mind, that means all existing decisions and relationships will remain intact. Plus, I agree with Dean, +Jonah has garnered tremendous moral authority in North America since his election. Sad to say, but +Philip and +Demetrius have seen considerable erosion in their’s.

]]>
By: Dean Calvert https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8562 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:12:01 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8562 In reply to Ben.

Ben,

While it may appear that way…with the Moscow patriarchate squarely in the driver’s seat, I sincerely doubt the status of the OCA is likely to change.

Furthermore, anyone thinking the OCA is going to slip quietly under the water, abandoning it’s autocephaly without getting anything in exchange (like a united American Church) has severely underestimated the new metropolitan.

Just my opinion.

Best Regards,
dean

]]>
By: Ben https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8561 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:56:56 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8561 Does this also give a blow to the OCA as well, essentially reducing it to autonomous status, since the Ecumenical Patriarch didn’t sign the tomos, or am I mistaken as to the actual reality of the situation?

]]>
By: Isa Almisry https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8560 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:14:51 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8560 Iconium? At the earliest the last DL would have been in 1923: there were hundreds of thousands of Turkish Orthodox, the Karamanlis, in Konya and Cappadocia until the population exchange. Ataturk didn’t allow non-Muslim Turks for the most part.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8551 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:14:48 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8551 Dean, re Iconium, I don’t know. Hopefully somebody does. But let’s be honest, the abeyance of liturgies in Iconium is emblematic of Istanbul in general. It’s just taking Istanbul longer to become extinct.

Interesting take on the GOA laity laying down the hammer on the Phanar. I see your point, that they’re acting like a “living church.” I wonder though, are they aware of this? I have a reticence based on the fact that the EP and the GOA/Archons prop each other up for PR purposes: The EP/Phanar needs the GOA/Archons for money and political influence, the GOA/Archons rely on the EP/Phanar for nostalgia. Clearly, no exarchate in America needs Istanbul for legitimacy, question is: do they see it?

]]>
By: Dean Calvert https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8550 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:11:23 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8550 Hi Isa,

Yep…I zeroed in on that exact same paragraph. He might as well have said, “this is the way it’s going to be done, whether or not C’nople likes it.”

For some reason, this statement struck me as definitive – but the entire tone of this statement struck me as “no longer ridiculously deferential”. To be honest, your words from a couple days ago are ringing in my ears.

This are clearly changing…perhaps the reason the Preparatory Talks have gone into warp speed is the election of a new Russian patriarch, who is no longer willing to sit around and wait for the Patriarchs of the dead sees to get their acts together.

One thing is for sure…we are witnessing history.

I continue to believe that the gap between the “dead” churches and the “live” churches will continue to grow – but, as you suggest, with the “live” churches increasingly running the show, either overtly or from behind the scenes.

It’s interesting…even the recent demand of the Exec. Committee of the Archdiocese Council (that the metropolitan of Iconium be sanctioned) could be placed in the same category…i.e., the “live” churches no longer bowing to the “dead” ones.

Yep…we are witnessing history unfold – a realignment of world Orthodoxy.

All I can say is, “about time”.

Best Regards,
Dean

PS Anybody know when the last liturgy was served in Iconium, the See of this guy with the nerve to criticize the Archbishop of America? According to Wikipedia, the city was conquered by the Seljuks following the battle of Manzikert in 1071. And according to the 1895 census, the city contained 899 Greeks.

]]>
By: Isa Almisry https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8548 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:36:59 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8548 This is the key part:
‘For the sake of church peace we agreed to have the bishops’ assemblies chaired in accordance with diptychs. However, the powers of the chairmen and the bishops’ assemblies themselves were defined very clearly. As we insisted, all their decisions will be made only by consensus. Canonical relations of bishops with their own Primates and Synods are not challenged, nor are the powers exercised by bishops in the diaspora diminished. Thus, our bishops in the diaspora will be able to make an active influence on the decision-making process in bishops’ assemblies.”

So no, C’ple doesn’t have veto power, no, the Mother Churches are not going to have the power to broker a deal (like the recent C’ple-Jerusalem fiasco in North America) and force it on the “diaspora,” no, Chambesy didn’t validate Met/Archb/EP/Pope Meletius’ interpretation of canon 28.

Yeah, the MP is in the engineers seat, although EP is allowed to play conductor.

]]>
By: AOI Observer: Patriach Kirill on Chambesy https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8544 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:36:19 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8544 […] AOI Observer reports on recent statements from Russia’s Patriarch Kirill regarding the Chambesy […]

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/pat-kirill-on-chambesy/#comment-8543 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:34:25 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=5815#comment-8543 Yup, it looks like the Phanar lost on this one. Clearly the MP is driving the train.

]]>