Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$global_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 468

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$blog_prefix is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 469

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_hits is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 475

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property WP_Object_Cache::$cache_misses is deprecated in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php on line 476

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-content/object-cache.php:468) in /home/aoiusa/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Met. Jonah addresses the future of Orthodoxy in America https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/ A Research and Educational Organization that engages the cultural issues of the day within the Orthodox Christian Tradition Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:38:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.3 By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4826 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:38:52 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4826 Ryan, good points. As far as I’m concerned, “patriarch” is nothing but an honorific. But because our state is fallen, the Archbishop of Constantinople demanded it for himself. Previous to that time there were only three patriarchs: Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch. All regional churches were autocephalous however. Their constituent dioceses were autonomous. All were ruled by bishops or archbishops. The bishop of the regional capital was a metropolitan archbishop.

I think that the title patriarch has wrought too much trouble. perhaps it should be done away with. Autocephaly however is non-negotiable for the local Church of America. But that’s my opinion and I’m a fallen man myself.

]]>
By: Ryan Close https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4825 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:43:18 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4825 I would like to turn that question back to those who advocate it. I feel they have the burden of proof so to speak. Why a patriarchate? What does it mean? It would only be a patriarchate in name. In every other respect it would be a autocephelous metropolitanate. Think of Cyprus. The Church in Cyprus was the first autocephelous Church and the Archbishop of Cyprus has all the perogitives of a patriarch, such as the vestments and how he signs his name and all, but he is still called an arch-bishop. If America is to ultimately be a Patriarchate, shouldn’t that come after a long time of being an ordinary autocephelous church? If every local church gets to be a patriarchate then wouldn’t that make the word meaningless? I think it might make sense if the autocephelous metropolitanate of North America formed “Autonomous Local Churches” in South America and Mexico. Then the Metropolitain of Norh America could claim patriarchal status as primate of final apeal over multiple Local Churches, and then eventualy declare them autocephelous in time. I guess the whole thing lies in our definition of Patriarch. I offered my two teared definition, where Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Moscow are (P1) Patriarchates and all the others are just honorary (P2) Patriarchates. But I am ignorant.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4814 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:34:45 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4814 Ryan, why not a patriarchate? Bulgaria wasn’t ancient when its archbishop received patriarchal dignity. Constantinople wasn’t either (or the three others). Only Russia was relatively ancient when its metropolitan became a patriarch.

]]>
By: Ryan Close https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4813 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:05:57 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4813 I have a technical question about Met. Jonah’s paper. Why a Patriarchate for America? Many Autocephelous Churches have primates with the title Metropolitan (or Archbishop in the latter Greek tradition). If the Church in America became a Patriarchate it would no longer be at the bottom of the list in the dyptics and we all know what Jesus said about the last. I love the idea that whatever united Orthodox Church in North America would be an autocephelous metropolitanate at the end of the list! Furthermore, outside the original Pentarchy plus Moscow, does the word “Patriarch” have any real meaning.

I tend to agree with Bishop Basil that none of the other three (or four) Patriarchates of the pentarchy every relinquished their canonical territory. Constantinople of course did this but Autocephely and becoming a Patriachate seem to be like nationalistic power grabs. Except for the case of Coptic Alexandria granting Autocephely to Ethiopia and Eritrea. And then they became Patriarchates because they were very ancient and venerable Churches. I pray for their dogmatic and fully Orthodox acceptance of Chalcedon as well as the 7th council with which they seem to have the most trouble.

Anyway, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Romania are also ancient and venerable see, so it makes sense that their primatial bishop might receive the honorary title. But these are what I call P2 Patriarchates in distinction to the P1 Patriarchates of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Moscow. Where the Armenian Apostolic Church would fit into the dyptics, if they became Orthodox, is beyond me seeing that they have three or four Patriarchs two of which are Ctholicos.

So you see what I am getting at. The Church in America is not ancient. So why the need to make it a Patriarchate?

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4668 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:20:13 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4668 yeah, I see your point Dean. I thought Fr Mark was gracious in defending SCOBA but I think because of its indifference to (and absence from) Chambesy, they shot themselves in the foot. Of course the bright side of this is that we can look past SCOBA now. It was fun while it lasted.

]]>
By: Fr. Johannes Jacobse https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4667 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:31:39 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4667 That’s a good point Dean, a very good point in fact. Didn’t occur to me either. What wasn’t SCOBA in the forefront here? The only answer is that they had nothing to say.

]]>
By: Dean Calvert https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4666 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:58:24 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4666 George,

I would like to add to your comments about SCOBA.

AS I listened to the conference, I must confess that it never dawned on me to think that SCOBA should have specifically requested to have been present at those Chambessy meetings. At least one of the speakers asked that question, the answer to which was (to me) another meely mouthed no-answer answer from Fr. Mark Arey. I suppose I just placed myself on Bp Savas’ internet list…LOL

The more I thought about it, all other criticisms of SCOBA aside, it is absolutely an indictment of that group, and an admission of it’s complete ineffectiveness and irrelevance that it was not represented at the Conference. To be honest, it should not only have been represented – if it had any dynamism at all – they would have been presenting ideas and concepts on how to solve this mess.

In my eyes, SCOBA buried itself with that one.

Just a thought.

Best Regards,
Dean

]]>
By: Fr. Johannes Jacobse https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4640 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:00:15 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4640 I am convinced that the seeds of American cultural renewal lie in the Orthodox moral tradition, particularly in the depth of its theological anthropology. We have not begun to address this dimension of human existence in any modern sense except in cursory ways. This assertion is recognized by others as well, Fr. George Morelli and Fr. John Schroedel to name two, and I am sure there are others.

We must move forward, and the only way to do that I have come to believe is through Orthodox unity. Unity is no panacea, but jurisdictional division is clearly hampering our missionary imperative including the engagement of American culture in ways that can enrich it.

It has been my private conviction for years that it is no accident that American Orthodoxy is coming into its own as the traditional Christian confessions are sinking into the confusion that grips so much of the larger culture. I see the emerging movement towards unity in America as critical and necessary, and am pleased to see awareness growing.

I also see the movement toward unity draws from aspects of the American character, particularly our impatience with regal pretense, a characteristic probably necessary in medieval societies to maintain social cohesion but totally foreign to the American consciousness. Some remark the American impatience with imperial trappings is a bad thing. I think, rather, that the notions of freedom and respect of the individual that informs the impatience conform closely to notions of individual freedom and responsibility found first in our Orthodox moral tradition. For this reason I was glad to see Met. Jonah’s assertion that it is time to de-imperialize Orthodox ecclesiology.

Something is changing in American Orthodoxy, and it is good. It is time to take responsibility for our own destiny and develop our own voice, our own apologetic, our own engagement with culture, and respectfully decline the interference in the American Church from leadership abroad that quite clearly has no real understanding of American culture, and no real insight or discernment about what it takes to be Orthodox within it.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4638 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:24:59 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4638 And we should accept tham as such, Fr. +Jonah was right, America has much to offer us. As Fr Hans has stated so eloquently, the founding documents of our republic were very much the fruition of Hellenism (not Greekism). We need to tap into what is good about America and Americans and try to redeem this land (and hope that we are redeemed as well in the process).

]]>
By: Fr. Gregory Jensen https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4636 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:13:04 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4636 George,

I think you are correct in your assessment. We do have “our work cut out for us” and we really cannot afford in terms of money, human resources or time “playing games.” At the risk of offending, we have settled for ethnic parishes and converts who flatter us but never challenge us. I’m a member of a professional society of Christian psychologists. Most of the members are Evangelical Christians. I have found them very interested in the Orthodox Church but often without anyone to speak them about their interests and concerns. And yes, they recognize a “con-game” when they see it–it isn’t just jurisdictionalism but also our too typical reliance on our being the “ancient Church” as if that absolves us from speaking with people on their own terms.

What I appreciate in Metropolitan Jonah’s address was his willingness not only to share the Church’s tradition with America, but his willingness to share the best of America with the Orthodox Church. I have so many professional colleagues who want to share with us the fruit of their research and professional experience. But they want to work with us a co-workers, as equals and not potential converts.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4635 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:23:16 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4635 Wesley, I like what you’re writing. There are many things to take away from Met +Jonah’s speech, but the biggest thing is that whoever is North America’s patriarch, he has to be a North American and not a Byzantine nostalgist.

+Jonah defended the territorial integrity of North America and in doing so, its cultural integrity as well. (And its culture is immigrant as well as native.) Eventually, all ethnic jurisdictions will have to decide for themselves whether they are fish or fowl.

Another thing I take away from this is that SCOBA is now moribund, somebody just needs to pull the plug on it. It was useful while it lasted, but in the last five years (and especially at those two meetings in which all bishops were invited) it was clear that its purpose had devolved into a type of super-annuated student council, whose purpose was to derail efforts at unity all the while lulling its participants into believing that this was not the case. It was clear that despite Fr Mark Arey’s well-spoken words, the battle for SCOBA was not tenable.

If I may add my 2 cents, SCOBA has become a complete waste of time and money and in this time of economic crisis, can no longer be defended. Although I’m a nobody, my advice to all in SCOBA is just forget about it. Just start meeting in this new episcopal body. Have +Jonah call the first meeting, see who shows up, agree to meet quarterly, see more bishops join, and then the following year, elect a new president. Put a term limit on him: elect a new president every year. Do this until a critical mass of about 75% of all North American bishops join, then declare that the OCA has now become the Orthodox Church of America. Elect a new patriarch.

I hate to put a blunt, businessman’s gloss on it, and please forgive me for my brusque manner, but we have our work cut out for us here in this country, and we can’t always be looking over our shoulder playing games and intriguing. It’s not Christian and those honest inquirers who are thirsting for the Truth know a con-game when they see one. Our jurisdictionalism and finger-pointing have now degenerated into nothing but a grudge match. A blind man can see it.

]]>
By: Wesley J. Smith https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4633 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:11:48 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4633 I was very encouraged by Metropolitan + Jonah’s remarks. First,he defended the OCA’s autocephaly, but not in a belligerent manner. Second, he stated a willingness to blend the OCA with other N. American jurisdictions into a currently non existent entity that would become the North American Orthodox Church. In other words, he didn’t proclaim the OCA as the North American Church in waiting. Third, he said that such a Church should eventually have an elected Patriarch chosen from among the bishops that would be part of the new structure from the various jurisdictions that have merged, which seems to me to be a willingness to step back from “power” if he is not chosen to be that Patriarch.

I think this is a very productive way forward that would require humility on the part of all jurisdictions, but which could rectify the current jurisdictional-ism that hampers the OC in N. America.

]]>
By: George Michalopulos https://www.aoiusa.org/met-jonah-addresses-the-future-of-orthodoxy-in-america/#comment-4627 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:54:08 +0000 https://www.aoiusa.org/?p=2619#comment-4627 I applaud Metropolitan +Jonah and the entire OCA hierarchy for putting forward this audacious and timely seminar. It showed courage and intellectual honesty. I can’t think of any other jurisdiction at present which could pull this off as well as it id.

When +Jonah was elected, the word I kept hearing from people was “clarity.” That is so refreshing as usually what we get from all jurisdictions is diplospeak at best and cobwebs at worst. Because of such clarity we can hope to see a united American church in the near future.

]]>