Years ago, theologians at St. Vladimir’s proposed that the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate be restructured along lines similar to the UN Security Council, with permanent members, like ambassadors, from the other Patriarchates sitting as members of that Synod–a “seat” for the Patriarchates of Russia, Georgia, Romanian, Greece, Cyprus, Serbia, Bulgaria, etc. So that, acting together, each “ambassador” expressing the position of the Church he represents and arriving at a consensus, the Ecumenical Patriarchate as the Chairman of that Synod, could, being truly ecumenical, speak on behalf of the entire, world-wide, Orthodox Communion.
This is one of those ideas that makes such eminent sense that the possibility of its implementation is regrettably remote.
]]>Mr Smith,
I just read a good review of your newest book in The American Spectator. I look forward to buying it soon.
]]>Thanks, Fr. Michael, for heralding this important truth of our Church.
Axios!
]]>..and why the Church Fathers would NEVER have agreed to any of the Old World patriarchates running dioceses half a globe away.
With all it’s failings…the OCA system worked. A bad bishop in Alaska was removed…due to the courage of the Holy Synod…and the determination and efforts of the two bishops who decided to make the trip to investigate.
Later, a crooked metropolitan was removed the same way…and replaced.
For all the warts and bumps in the road – the idea of synergy – the laity working in symphony with the hierarchs and clergy…WORKED!
It’s important that we learn from these events..and contrast them to 1.) what has just occurred in the AOCA (an autonomous church) 2.) what will soon happen in the AOCA following the departure of Metropolitan Philip and 3.) what will happen in the GOA (an eparchial province) when Archbishop Demetrios retires or is forced to retire.
Best Regards,
Dean