Hopes rising for unifying Orthodoxy’s U.S. churches (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
]]>Fr Gregory, re point #2, absolutely correct. In reading and rereading Rev Lambrianides’ address at Holy Cross last March, much mention was made of the cacaphony that characterizes much of American Orthodoxy (in his eyes). Yet after much thought, it became obvious that while the EP’s minions claimed leadership over the Diaspora in America, they never once acknowledged the failure of their leadership (assuming his critique was correct). As I’ve written and said countless times, if (for example) the quality of our hymnody is poor, then why doesn’t the Phanar pay for the proper training of the GOA’s cantors and choristers? To ask the question is to answer it…
]]>(1) Here in America demonstrate tangibly that the GOA can and will make room for non-Greek Orthodox Christian (both individually and as parishes). Yes, non-Greeks can join a GOA parish but those parish are (to a greater or lesser degree) always GREEK parishes. It is one thing to have separate ethnic dioceses under the EP here in America but it is another thing to integrate these other ethnic groups in to the GOA. The former is smacks of separate but equally, the latter will require the surrender of Greek ethnic identity as normative for the GOA.
(2) Claiming leadership in the Diaspora seems to me to require also the humble acceptance and acknowledgment that the EP is also responsible for the failures of the Diaspora. The EP can’t simply come in and take over without accepting responsibility for the mess made by neglect and/or mismanagement. Responsible leadership is more than simply declaring victory.
In Christ,
+FrG
]]>