Fr. Hans wrote this recently on another forum, in part: “Secularism is not a coherent and thus sustaining belief system. Why? Because It’s merely a layover from one historical epoch to another. In the end, ideological secularists will either rediscover their Christian roots or capitulate to the strong man (could be Islam, could be authoritarianism/totalitarianism).”
My intuition is that he is correct. Why is it the folk that won’t negotiate with their legal process, they’ll accommodate and submit to?
I would really welcome an article that quite clearly connects the dots. An article that takes the reader by the hand from things one can check to this conclusion.
]]>