Met. Philip offers background on new Archpastoral Directive

Metropolitan Philip, the head of the Antiochian Orthodox Church in North America, issued a statement today explaining some of the background to the Archpastoral Directive of March 3. The letter follows:

Beloved Hierarchs and Clergy, Members of the Board of Trustees of the Archdiocese, Parish Councils and Faithful of this God-Protected Archdiocese:

Greetings and blessings during this Holy Lenten Season!

There have been some questions raised regarding the February 24th decision of the Holy Synod of Antioch which addressed the status of bishops across the entire See of Antioch. The purpose of this letter is to try to answer these questions so that confusion may be avoided.

The first question deals with whether or not I am supportive of the decision of the Holy Synod of Antioch which was taken on February 24, 2009. I am supportive of this decision, for a simple reason. I am convinced that the institutional structure of our Archdiocese here requires it at this time. One of the greatest assets that we have been blessed with in this Archdiocese is our strong unity. We cannot take any chance that disunity would occur in the Antiochian Archdiocese. I believe that this decision supports maximum unity and guards against any fracture in the future. I approved the decision of the Holy Synod based on my background and personal experience. I came to this country in 1956 from a divided nation. I found in North America a divided Antiochian family: first between “Russy” and “Antaki”, and second between New York and Toledo. I worked very hard to unite this family at the cost of blood and tears. I will guard this unity with my life and I will leave to our future generations a strong and unified Antiochian family in North America. If we do not learn from the mistakes of history, we will be condemned to repeat the same mistakes. In my judgement, the models of other Orthodox jurisdictions simply do not work, and the examples are numerous. Most importantly, I do not see the action of the Holy Synod of Antioch as making that much practical change in the way we operate. Most of the auxiliary bishops will remain where they are. The auxiliary bishops will administer the dioceses on behalf of the Metropolitan. It is now clear that in the few instances in which the Metropolitan disagrees with the action of a bishop, that the Metropolitan has the authority to reverse that decision. While we have vacancies in some of the dioceses, it is important that the Metropolitan have the flexibility of moving a bishop to a place where the best interests of the Archdiocese can be served.

The second question deals with the exact status of our bishops. The decision makes it very clear that our bishops within this Archdiocese will now be considered Auxiliary Bishops. But we need to focus on the practical application of that change, and not just a title. in due time we will begin the work of editing the “Manual of Hierarchical Duties and Responsibilities” so that these changes will be clear. The Archpastoral Directive of March 3, 2009 made it clear that the Metropolitan is to be commemorated in all divine services. The auxiliary bishop will be commemorated only in the case that he is present at the divine service.

The third question deals with the impact of this decision on the provisions of our Self-Rule as well as certain articles of our Pittsburgh Constitution.

Our Self-Rule status remains in effect with regard to the relationship of this Archdiocese to the Holy Synod of Antioch. The decision of the Holy Synod is a narrow administrative decision, addressing only the standing of bishops across the See of Antioch. As we know from church history, administrative structures come and go as the needs of the church change over time. As you are all aware, there are still some differences that exist between the Archdiocese Constitution that was approved in Pittsburgh, and the constitution that was proposed by the Holy Synod of Antioch as an alternative. These differences will be addressed with the Patriarch, myself, and the Holy Synod in due time.

I pray that you will all have a blessed Journey to the Empty Tomb.

Yours in Christ,

Metropolitan PHILIP
Archbishop of New York and Metropolitan of All North America


  1. No doubt this decision is the result of the unintended consequences (fruits) the of the recent rebellion of the “American Orthodox Church” zealots in the OCA.

    They have spooked both the Patriarchate of Antioch and their own Self-Ruling Metropolitan. The hierarchs saw all of the former-Protestants in the ranks of their clergy and feared their nascent Protestantism that ironically is a result of the the very Eastern Rite protestant ethos that they themselves help to perpetuate in North America!

  2. Here are a few observations?

    1) How is the Metropolitan of the AOCNA elected or chosen?

    2) Given the status of the constitution as described by the Metropolitan do the deliberations of the Church in America have any real meaning? Are any actions of the Archdiocesan Conventions valid? Is the Archdiocesan Convention, Board of Trustees etc just decorative bodies with no real authority?

    3)How can you really have self rule without the structures in place for self governance? Its almost Orwellian to call the AOCNA self ruled today. Its like a country proclaiming itself democratic but only one person can run for president and there are no choices.

    4)Who is the bishop of all of these dioceses? Has each diocese of the AOCNA now been vacated and dissolved?

    5)Its sad to read the Metropolitan’s reflection on Canons and Constantinople given these current events. Has the vision of unity now changed?

    6)The Comments about the governance of other jurisdictions not working deserves more clarification. What is not working? and is the solution to a crisis in Orthodox Governance the dissolution of the structures of self rule and the consolidation of power at the executive level. Its like the Founding Fathers of America giving up and crawling back to King George in England. Self rule is not nor should it ever be easy.

    7)Most Importantly! The question needs to be answered quite simply what is more important The Unity of Orthodox Christians in North America of the unity of the AOCNA?

    I do not think there were really be any answers to these questions but I do think they are worth asking and seeking serious answers.

Care to Comment?