“Don’t Call Us…We’ll Call You” – The Pentecost Experience of Evangelical Orthodox Christians at the Phanar

Source: Orthodox News

By: George Matsoukas

June 11, 2006

As we celebrate Pentecost 2006, it is useful to remember Pentecost Sunday, June 2, 1985.  That is the date and feast day that the Ecumenical Patriarchate and its Holy and Sacred Synod of Bishops chose to refuse an audience with the party of 18 Evangelical Orthodox Christians whose 12 year journey to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church led them to the Church of St. George at the Phanar, Istanbul, Turkey.  Some of the details of this journey have been chronicled by Father Peter Gillquist in his book “Becoming Orthodox.”

The 18 Evangelical Orthodox Christians at the Pentecost services, the first kneeling service they witnessed, included their top leadership: Father Peter Gillquist the presiding leader, Father Gordon Walker, leader of the members of the movement from the East and Father Richard Ballew, the leader of the members from the western part of the USA.  Representing the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese was Father Gregory C. Wingenbach, presently serving in Missoula, MT, assigned to accompany the group – only hours before those from the east coast were to depart from Kennedy Airport, NYC.  He replaced then Bishop (now Metropolitan) Maximos of Pittsburgh, who arranged for the delegation to meet with the Ecumenical Patriarch and the Synod, and who supported and guided their journey to Orthodoxy.   Dr. Apostolos Athanasakes, Chairman of the Department of Classics, University of California at Santa Barbara, was also part of the delegation and served as the guide to the group.  The Secretary to Ecumenical Patriarch Demetrios, Metropolitan Bartholomew, the present Patriarch, when pressed by the group, told them after the service that the Patriarch and Holy Synod were glad they were on a pilgrimage to the Holy Mother Church but they could not meet with the Patriarch.  This interaction took less than two minutes. 

The members of the delegation left their first Pentecost service in the Orthodox Church upset, depressed and disturbed.  Dr. Athanasakes suggested later that afternoon that they write a letter of appeal to the Patriarch and the Holy Synod which they did.  Dr. Athanasakes personally circulated the letter to selected members of the Holy Synod whom he knew.  The results were that a meeting was set up with Fathers Peter Gillquist, Walker, Ballew and Metropolitans Bartholomew and Maximos of the Holy Synod attending.  This meeting was held two days after Pentecost and lasted about one hour.  Gifts were presented to the Patriarchate from all the Orthodox Evangelical missions including homemade quilts, blueberry jam and an appropriate monetary gift for the Patriarchal orphanage.  Also, photographs of the missions were presented to the Metropolitans.  The meeting concluded with instructions from Metropolitan Bartholomew for the group to go home and continue their dialogue with Archbishop Iakovos.  They left Istanbul without meeting with the Patriarch.

RETURN HOME VIA BOSTON AND A MEETING AT HOLY CROSS SEMINARY

From Istanbul they journeyed to Thessalonica Greece to the Monastery of Vatopedia where tradition holds that St. Paul preached his first lesson to the people of Thessalonica.  The altar of the chapel in the monastery is built on the stone where St. Paul stood to preach his lesson.  Two days later, they returned home via Boston.  There, they attended the World Council of Churches meeting on “Baptism, Communion and Ministry.”  Their attendance at this meeting had been scheduled as part of the visit to the Phanar.  Bishop Maximos of Pittsburgh had made these arrangements.  For the first time, the Evangelical Orthodox Christians journeying to canonical Orthodoxy met Orthodox Bishops from all over the world, including Coptic Bishops.  The World Council of Churches sponsored and paid the passage for many of the bishops to attend the meeting that brought all these leaders together to help them begin to think about Unifying Orthodoxy World–Wide.  Whom did they meet at this meeting?  None other than Metropolitan Bartholomew, the present Ecumenical Patriarch, who was surprised to see them there and wondered why they were there. 

The delegation pressed to meet with Archbishop Iakovos, of Blessed Memory, to learn why they had not been received by the Patriarch.  Finally, they met in a small conference room in the main seminary building.  The meeting was short.  He told them that he was glad they had made their pilgrimage to the center of Orthodoxy.  Father Gordon Walker asked how they could continue their dialogue with him as they had been instructed in Istanbul by Metropolitan Bartholomew.  Archbishop Iakovos replied: “Don’t call us, we’ll call you.”

WHY THE EVANGELICAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS WERE REFUSED A MEETING WITH THE PATRIARCH AND WHY THEY WERE NOT WELCOMED INTO THE GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE

As Father Peter Gillquist was departing a day earlier to travel to Istanbul on May 29, 1985 because of an airline strike, Archbishop Iakovos was sending Fr. Peter a telegram, which he did not receive until his return home.  The telegram stated that the delegation should not travel to Istanbul.  The east coast members of the delegation left a day later from Kennedy Airport and learned on their arrival at the Airport that Bishop Maximos of Pittsburgh had been replaced by Father Gregory C. Wingenback as the representative of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese to accompany them to Istanbul. 

What caused these sudden changes in the plans that had been made over months and years?  At the end of May 1985 (within the week of the planned departure of the Evangelical Orthodox), the Ambassador of Greece to the United Nations flew to New York for the day to meet with Archbishop Iakovos to inform him that the Greek government did not want a large group of Americans to be taken into the Greek Orthodox Church.  Such a conversion would weaken the ties between the Greek nation and the Archdiocese.   Bishop Maximos was summoned to New York and was asked to be part of the meeting between the Archbishop and the Greek Ambassador to the United Nations.  Bishop Maximos was stunned and asked how could a government could dictate the Church’s decisions in such matters? 

CONCLUSION

The Orthodox Churches of America are held in captivity by the governments of the mother countries, the lack of ecclesiastical leadership in the United States and the weakness of the Phanar. It would appear that the Phanar has decided that rather than being Ecumenical and carrying Christ’s message to all peoples, to all nations and to all races, it will instead be the leader of the Greek people throughout the world.  It has developed the concept that it is the leader of the omogenia (people of the same race) i.e. Greeks.   In this way, it has the support of the Greek government as it expends its efforts, energies and time in programs for the advancement of “Hellenism”,  the preservation of the Hellenic language and the teaching of Hellenic culture as it “Hellenizes” the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese.  The office of the Patriarch has been diminished in stature and remains a remnant of Ottoman rule, when the office was relegated to civil servant status and the duty of the Patriarch to his Ottoman masters, was to keep all the Orthodox in the empire in line so that the Ottomans could rule them. Today, he serves a similar function for the Greek government by preaching Hellenism as an integral and indispensable part of Orthodoxy.  Although he is in fact very fluent in English when he speaks to the Greek Orthodox Christians in the United States, he addresses them in Greek although the vast majority is not fluent in Greek.  His All Holiness does not address his flock in America as “my beloved spiritual children” or “my beloved Orthodox brothers and sisters,” but rather he addresses them as “OMOGENIA” (people of the same race) or in other words “my fellow Greeks.” 

We pray that Patriarch Bartholomew revisits these actions and decisions and exercises his ecumenical responsibilities by convening a Great and Holy Council of the Orthodox Churches and also includes the Oriental Orthodox Churches.  The all too many unfortunate decisions and actions of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, as exemplified by the decision in 1985 not to receive the Evangelical Orthodox, have weakened the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America so that today it is in a dormant and no growth situation, barely able to replace its numbers.

On the other hand the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese has flourished as a vibrant Church, doubling the number of its members in recent years.  The influence of those Christian pilgrims seeking the truth of Orthodoxy, who in 1985 were excluded from the Orthodox Church by the Ecumenical Patriarchate and later were accepted and “welcomed home’ by the Orthodox Church of Antioch, has resulted in blessed and wonderful consequences for Orthodoxy.  They have enabled the faith to be projected to our neighbors who live in our land and with Apostolic (missionary) zeal are embarked on the Holy Mission to bring America to Orthodoxy.  They have been catalysts for the renewal of Orthodoxy in America. And without distinction among races, cultures, people or nations, they truly and wholeheartedly accept and endeavor to carry out Christ’s Great Commission:

“Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you, and lo, I am with  you always, even unto the end of the world.” Matt.28, 19-20

George Matsoukas
Pentecost 2006

George Matsoukas is Executive Director of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL).

Comments

  1. Isa Almisry :

    Christ is risen!

    Is any comment necessary?

    Except that the massacre at Ligonier was foreshadowed.

  2. George Michalopulos :

    Isa, an oldie but goodie. This story needs to be told and re-told. If nothing else future generations of hierarchs will learn from this episode how not to run a church.

  3. Heartbreaking to read. I can only hope that there is more to it than that, but – on the face of it – it’s troubling. And to travel all that way without receiving either an audience or explanation would seem to be very bad form. As I said, I can only hope that there is more to the story that what is presented.

    IF the Church actually did choose to serve a government – any government – rather than Christ, wouldn’t it be guilty of treason? It might still be the Church, but it has risked placing itself under the threat that Christ Himself will remove its lampstand from its place.

  4. George Michalopulos :

    Chrys, I wish I could say that “there was something more to it” than that, but there wasn’t. I had the pleasure of meeting one of the men who made that arduous journey. Trust me, Gillquist’s narrative of the event –though true–was softened considerably in order to not reflect even more poorly on certain people. Perhaps the lampstand is being removed as we speak.

  5. Although he is in fact very fluent in English when he speaks to the Greek Orthodox Christians in the United States, he addresses them in Greek although the vast majority is not fluent in Greek. His All Holiness does not address his flock in America as “my beloved spiritual children” or “my beloved Orthodox brothers and sisters,” but rather he addresses them as “OMOGENIA” (people of the same race) or in other words “my fellow Greeks.”

    Every Orthodox Christian needs to remember the above very clearly. The GOA and its leadership operate on a principle of Omogenia before Orthodoxy that is race before faith. People who are not part of the “special race” omogenia may be tolerated in the GOA but they are ultimately considered second class citizens. For the GOA its about maintaining racial purity.

    Its all really a tragedy. I feel so bad for the Greek Orthodoxy Clergy and Leaders of today who have been fed these fantasies for years. They are trapped in the Golden Prison of large paychecks and suburban lifesyles. Their spirit worn out by a system tears down and controls rather than builds up and liberates. These clergy and leaders now have to continue to promote these fantasies to a new generation to keep the money flowing.

    However in the America of 2010 demography is destiny and the world is changing. Outside the fantasy world of 79th Street and the Greek Press the Omogenia before Orthodoxy mentality is rapidly coming apart. People do not speak ancient or modern Greek, they marry who they wish, and they view their faith as a choice. Omogenia is just something that entertains you at the local Greek food festival these days. Omogenia is just nostalgia. Nostalgia not for the real Greece and her people because the GOA cannot handle the real Greece and its real problems. Omogenia is nostalgia for a fantasy world.

    In an age when America elected an African American President, the GOA looks more backwards than ever with its omogenia before Orthodox Mentality. No amount of “Gather my people home” conventions or blue ribbon mixed marriage task forces are going to delay the impending collapse of the Omogenia before Orthodoxy mentality.

    American Orthodoxy is here and its alive and growing. The next generation of leaders are not going to be Greeks like Eliphidorios Lambrinadis with their elitist outlook. The next generation of Orthodox leaders are not going to care about Omogenia. They will care about building the Church in America one person and one parish at a time.

    The word Greek in Greek Orthodoxy is going to look alot like the word Roman in Roman Catholic. Nobody today would ever think the Roman Catholic Church is just for Romans. In the future, nobody will think the Greek Orthodox Church is just for Greeks.

    And just like the Roman Catholic Church which elected a Polish Pope. I am sure that we will one day see a non-Greek elected Ecumenical Patriarch and a non-Greek elected Archbishop Of America and primate of the GOA.

    I also suspect that all of this will happen much sooner than anyone can possibly imagine.

  6. Dean Calvert :

    The story is as poignant today as it was 20 years ago when I first read it. It’s even sadder when you hear the stories told in person, by the participants.

    I remember exactly where I was when I read that story….because it was the first time in my life I had ever been embarrassed to be Greek.

    In the years since then, I’ve often wondered, “Can you imagine the future in store for those responsible for this?”

    I’m more inclined to pray for them, than to be angry at them. We cannot possibly conceive what God has planned for them. All i know is that I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy.

    Kyrie Eleison.

    Best Regards,
    Dean

  7. The fact that these people eventually found someone to accept them (Antioch) simply proves that they must love being treated like dirt. When conversion to Byzantinism demands both a rejection of one’s own traditions and ethnicity perhaps it is normal that converts to Byzantium love submission and self-loathing.

Care to Comment?

*

Top